Case 02 · Flagship

Cloud-Native AI Gateway

A production AI gateway turns model access into a governed platform capability: requests enter one boundary, policy is applied consistently, and observability follows every model call.

01

How it works

From request to a governed model call.

Cloud Native AI Gateway by Andrey Lesnikov — one platform boundary for policy, budget, fallback, and OpenTelemetry across model providers.

Architecture diagram of the Cloud Native AI Gateway: clients, gateway control, providers, and observability
Gateway first: policy and budget in the middle, providers and OTel on the edges.
Animated lifecycle of the AI Gateway: Request, Policy, Route, Observe
Lifecycle — Request → Policy → Route / budget → Observe
  1. 01

    Enter one boundary

    Apps and agents hit a single gateway instead of scattering provider SDKs, keys, and retry logic across services.

  2. 02

    Apply policy and budget

    Rate limits, prompt bounds, and spend caps are evaluated before a model is selected — decisions stay visible on the response path.

  3. 03

    Route with fallback

    Primary and secondary providers stay explicit so failover is an infrastructure path, not an app-level improvisation.

  4. 04

    Observe every call

    OpenTelemetry traces and cost signals follow the request so incidents and spend spikes have an owner.

02

Evidence

From problem to proof.

How the system is framed, operated, and proven — not a slide deck summary.

01
Problem

Teams often adopt AI providers directly from application code. That works for prototypes, but production quickly exposes missing controls around rate limits, cost, prompt boundaries, fallback, and provider visibility.

02
Architecture

The gateway sits between applications and model providers. It evaluates request policy, selects the target provider/model, applies budgets and rate limits, emits OpenTelemetry traces, and keeps provider fallback paths explicit.

03
Trade-offs

A gateway adds an extra hop and must be operated carefully. The payoff is central control: safer provider migration, clearer budget enforcement, reusable observability, and one place for policy.

Constraints

Latency, observability, prompt safety, rate limits, and failover behavior.

03

Related

Nearby systems.

Case 19 · Flagship

AI Runtime Platform

  • Python
  • vLLM
  • KServe

AI workloads often start as API calls but become production systems that need identity, policy, scaling, telemetry, and clear ownership

Every model call: policy + trace + budget

Case 26 · Flagship

AI Infra Control Plane

  • Python
  • Kubernetes
  • Terraform

Private AI platforms need shared governance across identity, policy, audit, cost, and SLO signals — not scattered service configs

Private AI with explicit platform contracts

Case 21

Cost and Token Observability

  • Meter
  • Owner
  • Budget

AI and cloud costs can grow quietly when usage is disconnected from teams, services, and deployment changes

Token spend visible before finance week

Available for meaningful infrastructure conversations

Build systems that stay calm under pressure.

Available for conversations

Talk infrastructure

Book a working session

Meet ↗

Evidence first

For deep dives

Explore the systems

All cases ↗