Make the right path the easiest path.
Kubernetes foundations, GitOps delivery, and policy boundaries as developer-facing primitives.
Andrey Lesnikov
Senior DevOps & AI Platform Engineer · Kubernetes · AI Infrastructure
Cloud-native platforms, governed AI infrastructure and resilient systems — designed to stay calm when production gets loud.
Engineering principle
The platform can be sophisticated underneath. The experience should still feel calm, legible and predictable — for developers, operators and the business.
Areas of work
Kubernetes platforms, governed AI, and proved recovery.
Kubernetes foundations, GitOps delivery, and policy boundaries as developer-facing primitives.
Routing, identity, MCP policy, inference and observability as one execution plane.
Recovery contracts with a binary PROVED / UNPROVED verdict — protect, validate, restore, prove.
Selected systems
Three flagship systems and six more repositories — each verified in CI on kind, minikube, or Compose labs.
Deterministic failure rehearsal for architectural assumptions, policy gates and evidence chains.
View case ↗GitOps control plane for industrial digital twins — compose, detect drift, reconcile, replay incidents.
View case ↗OpenAI-compatible gateway, MCP governance, KServe/vLLM, KEDA, OIDC, Redis and OpenTelemetry.
View case ↗Policy, identity, audit, MCP, FinOps and SLOs as one operating model.
View case ↗Failure injection and bounded remediation loops on the platform.
View case ↗N=3 CI benchmark of ready, self-heal and recovery times on kind.
View case ↗SBOM, VEX, runtime presence → ALLOW / WARN / QUARANTINE / BLOCK.
View case ↗PROTECT → VALIDATE → RESTORE → PROVE with binary PROVED / UNPROVED.
View case ↗AdmissionCheck ALLOW / HOLD / DENY — 13 unit scenarios, 8 kind e2e.
View case ↗GitHub ↗Book
Evidence-Driven Infrastructure Engineering for Kubernetes and AI
How do you know that your infrastructure change is actually safe?
Most platform books show how to assemble Kubernetes, GitOps, portals and pipelines. This book asks the harder question: when terraform plan is clean, CI is green and GitOps reports Synced, what evidence do you actually have?
Professional recognition is useful when it points back to real systems, real constraints and work that holds up under scrutiny.
Open proof page ↗Public builds with what they show, what was measured on their own corpus, and what they do not claim.
See the builds ↗A secure patch can still break production. NVIDIA Nemotron only proposes the YAML fix; an Intent Preservation Gate, which does not depend on the model, decides.
Read the build ↗An execution firewall for AI agents. The model only proposes actions; a deterministic policy engine decides allow or deny, with default deny.
Read the build ↗