Case 06

LLM Infrastructure Runtime

LLM Infrastructure Runtime: Problem: LLM workloads move faster than traditional platform controls and can quickly become expensive, opaque, and hard to operate. Constraints: GPU/CPU placement, model latency, token cost, prompt boundaries, provider limits, data privacy, and fallback behavior. Architecture: Runtime layer with model routing, request budgets, telemetry, policy checks, provider abstraction, and operational dashboards around inference flows. Result: LLM usage becomes a controlled platform capability with observability and operating contracts instead of isolated API calls.

Problem
LLM workloads move faster than traditional platform controls and can quickly become expensive, opaque, and hard to operate.
Constraints
GPU/CPU placement, model latency, token cost, prompt boundaries, provider limits, data privacy, and fallback behavior.
Architecture
Runtime layer with model routing, request budgets, telemetry, policy checks, provider abstraction, and operational dashboards around inference flows.
Result
LLM usage becomes a controlled platform capability with observability and operating contracts instead of isolated API calls.

Related topics: AI infrastructure, Kubernetes/EKS, GitOps, Terraform, observability, platform engineering, cloud architecture.

All case studies · Back to profile